14-01-2026, 10:49 PM
![[Image: 4kVT5gu.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4kVT5gu.png)
"Lodamun will walk away from an NC/NOCTO-copy", Hartman on Anantonese Ocean Security Dialogue
As Anantonese and Seleyan states converge on Altea for security dialogue, Lodamun weighs the costs and benefits of departing from centuries-long suspicion of alliances and opening up to an expanded, yet potentially non-binding arrangements
![[Image: B11A4767-2.jpg]](https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/B11A4767-2.jpg)
ⓘ: President Robert Hartman speaking to the media during his most recent press conference
The rise of ‘minilateralism’ throughout Terra has long been a fixation of the State Department. Their inherent qualities, namely limited memberships, functional specificity and a bias towards expediency over universal consensus, have rendered such arrangements more agile and politically tractable than traditional, larger multilateral arrangements. Indeed, owing to their ever-growing propensity to collapse into cumbersome, procedurally paralysed forums in the absence of ardent leadership, Lodamun has traditionally avoided many of the world’s larger multilateral security arrangements, including the Northern Council and its historic copies. It is against the background of this inherent scepticism of global and regional security arrangements that, historically, successive administrations have favoured tightly scoped, interest-aligned bilateral partnerships that place operational coherence at the forefront. It is also against this backdrop that the Lodamun’s historically high defence spending is brought into context as it reflects a long-standing view that a reliance on external security arrangements, such as the Northern Council and NOCTO, is ultimately a fragile substitute for autonomous national defence capabilities. “The Lodamese Government has always viewed it that a reliance on external multilateral arrangements, be they mutual defence agreements or anything else of the sort, amounts to a conditional guarantee whose credibility is dependent on political will and the domestic constraints of partners. Outsourcing parts of Lodamun’s security to other territories has always been a touchy subject for national security policymakers,” Dr. Norman Hutchinson, a Professor of International Relations at Drumford University, opined. Despite these long-standing reservations, reports of a loose security arrangement among the states of the Anantonese Ocean have piqued the interest of both the State Department and Whitehall.
Speaking at a press conference at Whitehall, wherein he fielded questions alongside Secretary of State Dale Baker, Secretary of Defence Diontay Howard, DNI Jared Bennett, and SDA Director Admiral Alan Casey, President Robert Hartman noted that Lodamun’s involvement in the proposed arrangement would be predicated on both its structure and the limitations it establishes for itself. He emphasised that any prospective engagement would need to remain deliberately narrow and devoid of entangling security guarantees, as he advanced that Lodamun would ultimately ‘walk away’ from any arrangement that mirrored dependency of Terra’s legacy security arrangements. “It ought to be noted that we [Lodamun] are not interested in arrangements which limit our freedom of action. Although we are by no means opposed to adhering to a common approach, cooperation cannot come at the expense of national/strategic discretion, nor should we be impelled to outcomes over which we do not retain full control. We will walk away in such an instance,” President Hartman said. Although the scope and nature of the arrangement are yet to be finalised, overtures from quarters in Altea suggest an emphasis not on traditional collective defence, but rather on consolidating participating states into a coordinated policy that aligns national efforts towards shared objectives. Similar overtures indicate that engagement would likely prioritise cohesion among partner states without subordinating domestic decision-making to an external agenda, ensuring that nations retain full independence in defining their respective foreign policies and pursuing their own national interests. Kalistan’s involvement in the supposed grouping has softened Kensington’s apprehension, albeit slightly. Both Lodamun and Kalistan have maintained a strong security relationship, backed by decades of cooperation in areas including intelligence sharing, weapons development and training. Kaliburg’s recent moves towards reconciling its historically difficult relationship with Altea have been identified by policymakers as evidence that the proposed arrangement might be worth considering beyond mere scepticism. “It is an inherent trait of the North Seleyan condition to be suspicious of the motives of other territories. The fact that Kaliburg is genuinely seeking to defuse its otherwise contentious relationship with the Eglian Government will certainly be encouraging for Kensington,” Dr. Hutchinson noted.
Some analysts and policymakers have noted the otherwise peculiar nature of Lodamun’s ‘bed-fellows’ within the proposed arrangement, particularly Egelion. The Lodamese Government, through the Strategic Defence Agency, has long voiced its strong opposition towards the proliferation of ballistic missiles and hypersonic weaponry, both of which form integral parts of Egelion’s defensive and offensive strategic capabilities. In fact, the SDA was originally established to counter the threat posed by the rapid proliferation of Beiteynu (now Amudim)-made intercontinental ballistic missiles. President Hartman, when pressed on this point, acknowledged the strategic dissonance but framed it within the broader calculus of the minilateral arrangement. “Functional specificity is a core part of this arrangement. Our mutual interests are the security of the Anantonese Ocean and the deterrence of non-state and extra-regional threats. This is not a forum for the harmonisation of strategic arsenals or grand strategy,” President Hartman responded. Secretary Baker noted that engagement with Egelion on this specific issue could, in fact, provide a direct channel of communication to address proliferation concerns, channels which might be more effective than the cacophony of a full multilateral forum. “We can compartmentalise our agreements and disagreements. I think that is something we [Lodamun] have always found appealing in the way we approach our allies and potential adversaries. The world does not operate in absolute terms, neither white nor black,” he said. Despite the pragmatism of President Hartman and Secretary Baker, both Admiral Casey and Secretary Howard expressed a more cautious tone, as they both sought to underline the strategic reality of Lodamun’s participation in the broader arrangement, against the backdrop of its historic concerns. “Our participation is contingent on the limits established in the negotiations to come. Intelligence sharing and awareness, coordinated patrols and perhaps a shared policy are all on the table. Although it may be difficult to divorce Egelion’s strategic weapons program from this arrangement, we are willing to meet at the centre,” Secretary Howard cautioned.
